4
The Physicists’ War
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
On August 2, 1939, Albert Einstein signed a letter to President Franklin
D. Roosevelt in which he stated:
Sir: Some recent work by E. Fermi and L. Szilard, which has been
communicated to me in manuscript, leads me to expect that the element uranium may be turned into a new and important source of
energy in the immediate future. Certain aspects of the situation seem
to call for watchfulness and, if necessary, quick action on the part of
the Administration.
Quick action might be necessary, Einstein continued, because
this new phenomenon would also lead to the construction of bombs,
and it is conceivable—though much less certain—that extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed.1
Eight months earlier, researchers in Berlin had announced to the world
the discovery of nuclear fission, the splitting of the uranium nucleus acCassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
73
companied by the release of a large amount of energy. (As with the word
nucleus, fi ssion derived from cell biology.) By the summer of 1939 it was
known in theory that atomic fission might result in a nuclear explosive of
unsurpassed power. But this was possible only if a sufficient amount of the
very rare form of uranium, the isotope uranium-235 (U-235), could be
assembled into a “critical mass,” the minimum mass needed to sustain a
nuclear explosion. The splitting of a U-235 nucleus was set off by the absorption of a neutron, which is not repelled by the positive nucleus. It was
discovered that when a U-235 nucleus fissions into two smaller nuclei, it
releases not only energy but also more neutrons, two to three on average.
These neutrons could then go on to split more U-235 nuclei, each of
which producing more neutrons. A chain reaction occurs. If the ball of
uranium is large enough and dense enough that the reaction continues for
many steps, so much energy is released so quickly that an explosion of
enormous energy occurs.
In 1939 no one yet knew for certain if such a chain reaction would indeed occur. Nor did they know how much U-235 was needed to attain
a critical mass, nor the best process for extracting the extremely rare
isotope U-235 from natural uranium ore, nor how exactly to set off the
explosive chain reaction. But, Einstein informed the president, they did
know that Germany was busily acquiring uranium in Europe and that
German scientists, who had discovered fission, were hard at work in Berlin on exploiting their discovery. Still, the likelihood that anyone could
build a fission bomb in the near future seemed very remote.
Less than a month after Einstein sent his letter to the president, Hitler
unleashed German panzer divisions onto Poland, igniting the war in Europe. In October 1939 the president, inspired by Einstein’s letter, established a small advisory committee at the National Bureau of Standards to
study the prospect of utilizing nuclear fission. Not until the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, bringing the United States to
the war against Japan, Germany, and their allies in what became World
War II, did Roosevelt finally authorize a crash program to build the bomb.
But by then, thanks to the familiar efforts of able science administrators,
a large portion of the physics community was already mobilized and ready
to join in support of the war effort in many areas, including the building
of the bomb. If World War I had been the chemists’ war, World War II
would be the physicists’ war.
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
74
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
A dm i n is t r at or s Ta k e C om m a n d
Among the able administrators who leapt into action were the familiar
players: Karl T. Compton; Robert A. Millikan; Isaiah Bowman, now president of Johns Hopkins University; Frank B. Jewett, now president of the
National Academy of Sciences and of Bell Laboratories and vice-president
of AT&T; and Karl Compton’s brother Arthur, the Nobel Prize physicist
at Chicago. But the lead role fell to one of the most able science administrators of the period, indeed of the century, Vannevar Bush, the president
of the Carnegie Institution in Washington, D.C., a research institute and
administrative arm of the Carnegie Endowment. James Bryant Conant,
an organic chemist and president of Harvard University, served as Bush’s
right-hand man.2
Born in 1890 to a middle-class family in Everett, Massachusetts, Vannevar Bush was the grandson of two sea captains. His father was a minister
in the Universalist Church. (There is no known relation with the presidential Bush family.) The younger Bush was, writes a biographer, “pragmatic, yet had the imagination and sensitivity of a poet, and was steadily
optimistic.”3 Bush was educated in engineering at Tufts College and received an engineering doctorate in 1916 in a joint program with MIT and
Harvard. During World War I, he had worked in the antisubmarine research laboratory at New London, Connecticut, sponsored by the National
Research Council (NRC). Returning to MIT after the war as an electrical engineering professor, Bush and his students invented a calculation
device for solving sixth-order differential equations that is considered a
forerunner of the modern computer. Bush rose to dean of engineering and
vice president of MIT during the early 1930s under MIT president Karl
T. Compton.
As an adherent of Hoover’s ideal of the public-spirited corporate technocrat, Bush, like Compton, Jewett, and other leaders, opposed government meddling in scientific and business matters through the New Deal.
But this did not hinder his good relations with Roosevelt’s White House.
In 1936 he was appointed head of the NRC Division of Engineering and
Industrial Research and in 1939 to the chair of the National Advisory
Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), the federally funded committee for
military aviation research.4
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
75
While Bush, Compton, Bowman, and others sought beneficial new relationships for science with the federal government following the demise
of the Scientific Advisory Board, Millikan offered the military the full
ser vices of the NRC in a collaboration reminiscent of that during World
War I. The military refused. It had its own laboratories and the NACA to
fund university and corporate research on military-related matters. Having experienced fi rst-hand the benefits of this type of collaboration
during World War I, Vannevar Bush, supported by Millikan, took up the
cause. He remained undeterred by military reticence as he sought new
ways to integrate science and engineering into military research as both a
boost to science and a support for the nation. The outbreak of war in Europe in 1939, together with the discovery of nuclear fission, suddenly gave
these men the ammunition they needed. In addition, most physicists, incensed by the persecution of scientists and the suppression of free thought
by foreign dictators, were willing to prepare for military research, even if
it required major compromises with the humanistic, progressive ideals
still held by most scientists and the general public.5
Bush, Conant, and colleagues were worried that the United States was
once again falling behind its European scientific competitors, especially
Germany, in scientific advances and in the development of new technological weapons. The lessons of gas warfare in the last war were still fresh
in their minds. Bush had already established the small Advisory Committee on Uranium with the president’s approval after the receipt of Einstein’s
letter. Although the United States was still officially neutral, Conant pushed
for war preparations in a meeting with Bush, Jewett, and others in Washington, D.C., in May 1940. The nation, Conant argued, was mired in
dangerous “isolationism,” and its leaders were unaware of the benefits that
science and technology could bring in time of war. Just as his predecessors
before America’s entry into World War I, Bush went straight to the president the next day to obtain his support to begin mobilizing American
science and technology for the nation’s probable entry into the war. On
June 14, 1940, Roosevelt approved the formation of the National Defense
Research Council (NDRC), chaired by Bush, tasked with preparing civilian science for military research.
As with prior committees, NDRC members included primarily civilian scientists: Harvard president Conant, MIT president Karl Compton,
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
76
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
Caltech dean of science Richard Tolman, and the president of Bell Labs
and the National Academy of Sciences Frank B. Jewett. To these were
added Conway P. Coe, the commissioner of patents, and an army general
and a navy rear admiral. A year later, Roosevelt, again at the request of
Bush and Conant, absorbed the NDRC into the new and larger Office of
Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) directed by Bush for the
coordination of the nation’s research in support of military applications.
Conant took command of the NDRC within the OSRD organization.6
Although other federal committees emerged to challenge the OSRD,
Bush successfully defended his organization as the one bearing prime
responsibility for the research and development of new military applications.7 Rather than putting the scientists in uniform, as occurred during
the previous war, Bush borrowed from the models of the NACA and the
NRC and, again despite the earlier appeals to pure science, readily enlisted civilian university and industrial laboratories to the cause through
federal contracts to undertake specific military research projects.
Most of the laboratories funded or created through the NDRC or
OSRD were located at the same elite universities that had received the
bulk of federal research funds and fellowships during the previous decades.
In fact, according to one assessment, the OSRD spent 90 percent of its
funds for academic contracts at just eight institutions.8 They, and leading
corporate laboratories, were now equipped and staffed at the highest levels
possible. Among the recipients of the new federal largesse flowing from
the mobilization program were MIT’s Radiation Laboratory for the development of radar, Caltech for the development of solid-fuel rockets, Johns
Hopkins for the proximity fuse, the University of Chicago’s Metallurgical
Laboratory for nuclear reactor design and construction, and Lawrence’s
Radiation Laboratory for the study and separation of fissionable isotopes.
Purdue University received a smaller contract to use its cyclotron for isotope separation as well as a subcontract in support of radar development.
Among the industrial laboratories, Western Electric, a subsidiary of
AT&T, received the largest corporate funding, followed by DuPont, RCA,
and General Electric. By the time of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,
it is estimated that 1,700 physicists were already working on war-related
research. Lawrence’s Rad Lab alone employed 142 physicists, of whom
nearly all were engaged in fission-related research.9
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
77
Bush and Conant were well on their way to success in their effort to
create a new model for the relationship of science, especially physics, with
the military and political power centers of American society. It was a relationship that, despite the avoidance of political influence, entailed the
integration of research with military needs. Once again, the aversion to
political influence did not extend to the military, mainly because most
scientists regarded the military as nonpolitical, even though its influence
on research might be even greater, while the ideology of humanistic, “disinterested” pure science was not needed, or wanted, in time of war. Looking to the future, the stage was already set for the postwar era.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
E s ta bl ish i ng t h e C h a i n of Com m a n d
Not until shortly before Pearl Harbor did nuclear fission become a top
priority for the civilian scientist-administrators. Controlled fission in a
reactor was likely to succeed soon, and theoretical research had pointed
to the possibility of a bomb, but Conant, Millikan, Lawrence, and other
leaders doubted that a bomb would prove technically feasible in this war.
That view began to change in October 1941 when the United States received a secret British report on fission prepared primarily by two German refugees working in Great Britain, Otto Frisch and Rudolf Peierls.
Code-named the Maud Report, it concluded that indeed “a uranium
bomb is practicable and likely to lead to decisive results in the war.” The
report recommended “that this work be continued at the highest priority
and on the increasing scale necessary to obtain the weapon in the shortest
possible time.”10
Bush once again went straight to the top. On October 9, 1941, he presented the British report during a meeting with President Roosevelt and
Vice President Henry Wallace. The president immediately approved exploratory research on building the bomb under the auspices of the newly
established OSRD. But not until a month after Pearl Harbor did Roosevelt
sign a letter drafted by Bush approving work in preparation for building
the bomb. And not until March 11, 1942, after Bush had submitted a progress report on the awesome power of the bomb and a possible race with
Germany for it, did Roosevelt approve a crash program to build the new
weapon. In a handwritten note sent to Bush, the president simply wrote,
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
78
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
“The whole thing should be pushed not only in regard to development, but
also with due regard to time. This is very much of the essence.”11 Yet not
until April 1943 was the Manhattan Project finally under way. Bush and
the American administrators were still overcoming their skepticism about
the feasibility of a nuclear weapon.
After Roosevelt’s approval of bomb exploration, in January 1942 Bush
reorganized the OSRD to bring scientists into closer collaboration with the
two military branches at that time, the army and the navy. Within days of
Pearl Harbor, he had already placed the Advisory Committee on Uranium,
now called Section S-1, under the oversight of James B. Conant. Under Bush
and Conant, the work of Section S-1 split among three research teams. Arthur Compton and the Chicago Metallurgical Laboratory, the “Met Lab,”
took responsibility for the fundamental physics, which included the theoretical research group on uranium fission under the direction of Oppenheimer at Berkeley. Lawrence was assigned research on the electromagnetic
separation of fission isotopes using the huge magnets of his new Berkeley
cyclotron, while Harold Urey at Columbia investigated gaseous diffusion
as a method for extracting the needed rare uranium isotope for an atom
bomb.12 Thus, by early 1942 the nation’s entire fission research effort rested
squarely under Section S-1, which was under Conant and his vice director,
Richard Tolman, of the NDRC, which was under the OSRD, which was
headed by Vannevar Bush, who stood directly beneath the President.
The military-style chain of command was intentional. After all, the
nation was at war. But, while working to bring scientists into partnership
with the military, Bush also arranged for them to occupy a dependent and
subordinate position within that partnership regarding research policy
and responsibility for their work. Only military and political leaders and
science administrators, mainly himself, were accorded any voice at all in
the overall direction and use of the research. Bush reported in a letter to
Conant that during his meeting with the president and vice president on
October 9, 1941, Bush had asked the president to issue an order “to hold
considerations of policy on this matter within the group consisting of
those present this morning, plus Secretary [of War] Stimson, [Army Chief
of Staff ] General Marshall, and yourself [Conant].”13 When Arthur Compton raised a policy question soon thereafter, Bush responded in an authoritative tone: “the problem which is placed before your committee is
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
79
the technical problem and not the problem of what should or should not
be the governmental policy in this program.” 14
It was the beginning of another important turning point in the relationship of physics to the political, military, and even corporate power centers
of society. Under Bush and Conant, the pure-science ideology of the scientist as the responsible keeper of moral culture and an equal partner with
other important groups in society was not only dropped, but replaced with
a much more limited and subordinate conception of the scientist. It was a
conception reflected in the OSRD’s system of contract research.15 Instead
of regarding the scientist as an elite, disinterested researcher of physical
processes standing above practical research, Bush and the OSRD now
viewed the project scientist as little more than a technician of nature fulfilling a contract, a worker relieved of any responsibility for the direction
of the research or its use.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
The Other R a d Lab
The Manhattan Project functioned as a subunit of the civilian-run OSRD
and its S-1 committee. Under the directorship of Vannevar Bush, the
OSRD pursued the usual policy of funneling federal contracts mainly to
the most prestigious university and corporate laboratories. Because much
of the military-related research concerned electronics, rocketry, nuclear
fission, and related topics regarded as engineering applications of fundamental physics principles, the vast majority of the contracts went for physics research. According to one estimate, in 1942 the OSRD spent four
times more on physics than it did on chemistry.16 Aside from atom bomb
development, one of the biggest recipients of OSRD funding was the
electronics laboratory at MIT. It was deliberately named the Radiation
Laboratory, or “Rad Lab,” after its Berkeley counterpart in order to confuse the enemy and outsiders. One of the biggest successes to come out of
the Rad Lab was the development of microwave “radar,” an acronym for
radio detection and ranging.17
Radar was already a reality before the outbreak of war, but its meterlength radio waves were prone to interference and unable to detect lowflying aircraft. The development of a radar system using 10-centimeterlength microwaves seemed the best alternative for detecting, identifying,
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
80
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
and navigating aircraft and ships. By early 1940 the Wall Street tycoon
and amateur physicist Alfred Loomis was at work in his private laboratory
on microwave radar under contract with the NDRC. Despite the heroic
efforts of Loomis, Lawrence, and others, the work was not going very
well when, in the fall of 1940, the British exported to the United States a
new invention, the “cavity magnetron.” The device, a resonator, promised
to produce microwaves in the 10-centimeter range with sufficient power
to generate an effective radar beam. The goal suddenly seemed within
reach just as the German Luftwaffe began its assault on London in an effort to bomb Britain into submission.
Bush’s NDRC, the predecessor of the OSRD, awarded nearly half a
million dollars to MIT for a project employing roughly fifty physicists to
develop microwave radar. Karl Compton’s connection with MIT and the
institute’s long-standing work with government and industry were strong
factors in its favor.18 Lawrence recommended Lee DuBridge, chairman of
the physics department at Rochester University, to head the new Radiation
Laboratory. Because cyclotron builders were familiar with the uses of resonant electromagnetic waves for the acceleration of particles in cyclotrons,
ten of the first members of the MIT Rad Lab were cyclotron workers, including several of the top “cyclotroneers” from the Berkeley Rad Lab.19
By spring 1941 the physicists of the MIT Rad Lab had a prototype
microwave radar device ready for testing. Unfortunately, it failed to meet
army aircraft specifications. But this early prototype was suitable for another use by the navy: the aircraft detection of German submarines when
they surfaced for air and battery recharging. Its successors proved more
successful in meeting the army’s needs.
After the United States entered the war in December 1941, the military
demands on the MIT Rad Lab for new electronic hardware increased dramatically, along with its budget. Within a year, the laboratory had a staff of
2,000 and a budget of $1.15 million. By the end of the war, the staff had
reached nearly 4,000 members, of whom 500 were physicists, and it occupied 15 acres of floor space in and around Cambridge, Massachusetts, and
maintained offices in several countries abroad. Its total wartime funding
of $1.5 billion was second only to that of the Manhattan Project, which
was about $2.2 billion.20
To keep up with the demand, the MIT Rad Lab established the Research Construction Corporation outside Boston for the production of
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
81
prototypes. Among the products assembled, many in collaboration with
British scientists and engineers, were advanced microwave radar for detection and navigation; radar jamming and evasion devices; and a system for
long-range navigation. This new system consisted of a network of crossed
beacons in the sky to enable planes and ships to determine their locations
to an accuracy of 1 percent.
Freed from university obligations, the physicists of the MIT Rad Lab
eagerly embraced the excitement of cutting-edge research, stimulating
teamwork, and the sense that they were performing a useful task for the
defense of their country. It was a formula that few could resist, even after
the war had ended. DuBridge later quipped that the atomic bomb ended the
war, but radar won it.21 The MIT Rad Lab devices and many of the scientists who invented them were involved in practically every major Allied
military operation of the war. During the D-day invasion of Europe in
June 1944, an advisory group of physicists successfully jammed German
coastal radar and provided radar beacons for the paratroopers’ drop zones.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Bu i l di ng t h e Bom b
Ernest Lawrence was in the midst of building his monster cyclotron when
Bush and the S-1 committee asked him to begin work on the separation of
the rare U-235 isotope from natural uranium. Because the extremely rare
isotope was chemically identical to the other, more plentiful uranium
isotopes, the usual chemical means of separation would not work. Instead,
Lawrence used the cyclotron as what is known today as a mass spectrometer, a device often employed for identifying chemicals and forensic
evidence.
In the retooled device, the electrically charged uranium nuclei moved
through the magnetic field of the cyclotron magnets and experienced a
force perpendicular to their direction of motion. This resulted in the bending of the paths of the nuclei into a curve. But the amount of curvature
differed according to the mass of the nuclei. Because of this, the various
isotopes of uranium, including U-235, were directed onto slightly different curved paths according to their slightly different masses, thus allowing
experimenters to separate U-235 from the other uranium isotopes.22
Lawrence, the experimentalist, had already worked closely with
Oppenheimer, the theorist, on problems of nuclear structure. After nearly
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
82
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
a year of collaboration on isotope separation at Berkeley, Lawrence had
Oppenheimer invited to a secret conference on fast-neutron fission to be
held in October 1941 at the General Electric Research Laboratory in
Schenectady, New York.23 Arthur Compton, chair of the conference, was
so impressed with Oppenheimer’s command of the theory of bomb design that he appointed him to lead the fast-neutron research unit at Berkeley. In May 1942 Compton promoted Oppenheimer to director of the
nation’s entire theoretical research effort on nuclear fission. The task was
to combine theoretical calculations with the scant available experimental
data on uranium metal and the fission process in order to estimate the required critical mass, the energy yield, and other information required to
construct the bomb. Oppenheimer organized a summer research session
in the Berkeley physics department to explore the prospects. In addition
to several of Oppenheimer’s assistants, a number of the nation’s top theorists participated, the majority of whom, like Hans Bethe and Edward
Teller, had immigrated from Europe.
By that time, researchers at the nearby Berkeley Rad Lab had already
discovered two new “transuranium” elements, elements beyond uranium
(element 92) on the periodic table. They were later called neptunium (element 93) and plutonium (element 94) after the planets beyond Uranus.
Both of these new elements are unstable, very fissionable, and easily produced as by-products of a working reactor. But only plutonium was stable
enough to be used as a substitute for uranium to power an atomic bomb.24
Oppenheimer reported to Arthur Compton at the end of the summer
that, in theory at least, a nuclear reactor and a uranium bomb were feasible
and that once a reactor is running it could be used to produce the easily
obtained fuel for a plutonium bomb. But the realization of either bomb
still “would require a major scientific and technical effort.”25 He also reported on his committee’s fi nding of the prospect of an even more powerful weapon: a fusion or hydrogen bomb, called the “Super.” Teller was
eager to continue exploring the prospects of the Super, but Oppenheimer
recommended, much to Teller’s displeasure, that work on the Super should
be put aside until after the war.
Bush and Conant eagerly welcomed Oppenheimer’s report as the fi nal
scientific justification required, in addition to Roosevelt’s approval, to
launch a crash program to build the bomb. On September 17, 1942, the
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
83
Army Corps of Engineers, which had been assigned responsibility for the
bomb project, promoted Colonel Leslie R. Groves, the “can-do” builder
of the Pentagon, to the rank of Brigadier General and commander of the
Manhattan Engineer District (named for the location of its early office) to
build the atomic bomb. The District included the newly formed Manhattan Project, the central laboratory charged with designing and building
the bomb from components produced at other locations of the so-called
District.
The general traveled to Berkeley to consult with Lawrence and Oppenheimer on the task ahead. To everyone’s surprise, at the end of October
1942, Groves appointed the unlikely Oppenheimer as the scientific director
of the Manhattan Project. The appointee had little experimental ability,
no administrative experience, and a questionable leftist political past. But
Groves saw in him a man who could quickly grasp the entire range of a
problem, command the respect of other physicists, and display as much
dedication as Groves to making this project a success. Even more important, Oppenheimer’s political vulnerability meant that, under Groves’s protection, he was unlikely to challenge Groves’s authority as commander.26
Upon Oppenheimer’s recommendation, Groves selected a remote site
near Santa Fe, New Mexico, then occupied by the Los Alamos Boys School,
as the location of the Manhattan Project, the central laboratory for the
design and assembly of the atomic bombs. The other components of the
effort under Groves’s command included Compton’s Met Lab at the University of Chicago, where the world’s first nuclear reactor went critical
under Enrico Fermi’s direction in December 1942. They also included
the Clinton Laboratories at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, which contained huge
industrial facilities for the separation of fissionable U-235 and the production of heavy water (used as an alternative to graphite for reactor construction); and the facility near Hanford, Washington, where the DuPont
chemical company, the inventor of nylon for parachutes and stockings,
designed, built, and ran plutonium-producing “breeder reactors” over the
objections of physicist Eugene P. Wigner, who was working with the Chicago team. (Wigner’s own doubtful design would not have worked because
of impurities.)
In 1943, at the insistence of the scientists, the University of California,
rather than a military agency, was selected to act as the institutional
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
84
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
contractor for the work at Los Alamos.27 Lawrence, Oppenheimer, and
many of the workers of the Berkeley Rad Lab brought the lessons of big
science with them as they transferred to Los Alamos. Despite some objections, the university’s role as the sole joint contract manager of both of the
nation’s nuclear weapons development sites—Los Alamos and, later, the
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory—has continued almost to the present. It
now shares that responsibility.
By the end of the war, the Manhattan Engineer District employed
over 200,000 people, making it the world’s largest and— at $2.2 billion—
most expensive research and development effort until the advent of the
Apollo Space Program, which landed a man on the moon during the 1960s.
People from everywhere in the country and all walks of life contributed to
the effort, from pipe fitters, welders, and Nobel Prize physicists, to the
machine operators at Oak Ridge known as the “Tennessee Girls,” and
the local Native Americans who served as maids and babysitters for the Los
Alamos scientists.28 In June 1943 British engineers began to arrive at
Los Alamos to aid in the effort as well.
Everyone involved was relatively young: most were in their twenties.
Isolated in the New Mexico wilds and with many newlyweds among the
workers, there was a veritable baby boom across the laboratory. As at the
MIT Rad Lab, all of this contributed to a sense of excitement, a common
bond with others sharing the difficulties and hardships of family life in the
ramshackle houses, and a dedication to the common goal of winning the
war. There was a universal feeling that this was a very special time in their
lives. Even today, the veterans of Los Alamos often look back upon those
days much as a later generation would look back upon Woodstock.
When Los Alamos fi nally got under way in April 1943, Oppenheimer
divided the laboratory and its work into four divisions: theoretical physics, experimental research, chemistry and metallurgy, and ordnance. A
fifth division was established for Teller with the task of planning for postwar projects, mainly the Super. It was not only Teller’s favorite research
topic, but Oppenheimer had apparently also sought to console Teller
for having selected Hans Bethe instead to head the theoretical physics
division.
One of the greatest remaining difficulties involved the triggering of the
bombs. The uranium bomb could be set off by joining together two sub-
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
85
critical pieces of U-235 into a critical mass. But the joining had to occur
extremely rapidly, or stray neutrons in the air would initiate the chain
reaction even before the critical mass was assembled, causing the bomb to
fizzle. The British suggested using a cannon inside the bomb to shoot one
hemisphere of uranium toward another at high speed. But this would not
do for plutonium, which is so fissionable that it would begin to explode,
then fizzle, even at the speed of an artillery shell.29
As fissionable uranium and plutonium began arriving at Los Alamos
from Oak Ridge and Hanford, testing revealed that the cannon design would
indeed work for uranium. Design and building of the uranium bomb
was soon under way. For plutonium, however, a very sophisticated rapidimplosion design was essential. Teller, John von Neumann, and Seth Neddermeyer, apparently borrowing from Tolman, who had gotten the idea
from the implosion deaths of stars, hit upon an arrangement involving a
critical mass of plutonium shaped into a spherical shell at very low density,
surrounded by an outer shell of conventional high explosive. Upon ignition, the high explosive would implode the plutonium extremely rapidly
into a tiny ball of dense critical mass, setting off a nuclear explosion. But
the implosive compression of plutonium had to occur under a precisely
spherical shock wave, or else the resulting lopsided critical mass would
yield only a minor eruption. If a spherical design could be made to work,
plutonium would be more suitable than uranium for the production of
an arsenal of nuclear weapons, owing to the relatively easy acquisition of
plutonium from the breeder reactors now pumping out the highly fissile
material at the Hanford site.30
With the implosion design and the arrival of the British engineers, the
pace quickened at Los Alamos. Ever determined to achieve success, General Groves was eager to deploy the new weapon as soon as possible. As
early as March 1944, three months before the D-day invasion of Germanoccupied France, he mobilized the Army Air Force to begin preparations
for dropping the atomic bombs on Germany and Japan. In September,
Groves ordered production schedules for the delivery of uranium and plutonium; in January 1945 Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, selected to pilot Enola
Gay, the B-29 bomber that would drop the uranium bomb on Hiroshima,
was already preparing his flight crew for its fateful task.
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
86
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Droppi ng t h e Bom bs
Because the solution to the implosion problem still seemed doubtful, the
Los Alamos scientists petitioned the navy captain in charge of the ordnance division for a precombat test of the plutonium bomb. None was
needed for the uranium bomb, which they were certain would succeed.
The captain hit the roof. He complained to Groves that by requesting a
test the scientists displayed an interest only in doing scientific research,
and that this test would delay the dropping of the bomb. Oppenheimer
attempted unsuccessfully to defend the scientists. Only after a visit to the
laboratory by James Conant and a letter from him approving the test did
the scientists at the bottom of the command chain receive their wish.31
The successful test of the plutonium bomb, the first nuclear detonation
in history, occurred on July 16, 1945, at the so-called Trinity test site in
the New Mexico desert near Alamagordo, about 250 miles south of Los
Alamos. The next day, a similar plutonium bomb was on its way to the
Pacific to join the uranium bomb for use on Japan.
As plans hastened for the Trinity test, the momentum of the work and
the pressure to complete it as soon as possible built to such an extent that
any doubts at Los Alamos about the project’s ultimate goals were overcome
by the sheer excitement of the science and the rapid progress of the work.32
Still, the possibility remained that Nazi Germany would be the first to
achieve a nuclear weapon, with consequences too horrible to imagine. But
by the end of 1944, as American and British forces began smashing their
way into France and Germany after D-day, it was evident that the Germans did not have the bomb and that Germany would be defeated before
the Allied bomb was ready. Joseph Rotblat, a Polish refugee engineer on
the British team, quietly resigned from the project. There was no longer
any need for the bomb, he felt: “The whole purpose of my being at Los
Alamos ceased to be, and I asked for permission to leave and return to
Britain.”33 Permission was granted. Although others had avoided joining
the Manhattan Project, and some now questioned the purpose of the project, Rotblat was the only one to resign. He later received the Nobel Peace
Prize for his postwar work toward nuclear control and disarmament.
As the building of the bombs proceeded at Los Alamos, General Groves
appointed a joint military and civilian Targeting Committee chaired by
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
87
Oppenheimer. Its task was to select the Japa nese cities to be targeted and
to determine the procedure for dropping the bombs, including the optimum height of detonation in order to achieve the maximum possible devastation. Physicists were then dispatched to the Pacific to arm the bombs
for detonation in flight over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In the dropping of
the bombs, physicists were not just the providers of new technical weapons but willing partners in their use.
Matters took a different turn at the Chicago Met Lab after it had completed its assigned tasks. Following the German surrender in early May
1945, objections to use of the bomb on Japan grew louder. They found expression in two important documents that emerged from Chicago. One was
a petition circulated by Hungarian refugee Leo Szilard and submitted to
the newly installed President Harry S. Truman on July 17, 1945, the day
after Trinity. (Roosevelt had died in office on April 12, 1945.) The petition
called upon the president to consider “the moral responsibilities which are
involved” and to offer the Japanese an opportunity to surrender rather
than being subjected to attack without warning. Otherwise, the petition
continued, a surprise attack would set a dangerous precedent for future
nuclear warfare. The president, however, had already left Washington for
a meeting of Allied leaders in Potsdam, Germany.34
The second document, the so-called Franck Report, emerged from the
Chicago laboratory’s Committee on Political and Social Problems, established at the Met Lab by its director, Arthur Compton. The chair of the
committee, Nobel physicist James Franck, a refugee from Nazi Germany,
submitted the report to the secretary of war on June 11, 1945.35 Like the
Szilard Petition, the Franck Report opposed a surprise nuclear attack on
Japan. It also called for a public demonstration to the Japanese of the
power of the bomb; and it warned of a postwar nuclear arms race if the
United States used the bomb.
But, equally important, the Franck Report may be seen as an attempt by
the scientists to regain control of their work. “In the past,” they declared,
“scientists could disclaim direct responsibility for the use to which mankind had put their disinterested discoveries.” But this is no longer possible
with nuclear weapons, they wrote, “which are fraught with infinitely greater
dangers” than past inventions. Of course, the report declared, “the scientists on this Project do not presume to speak authoritatively on problems
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
88
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
of national and international policy.” But, they continued, scientists are
among the small number of people who do have knowledge of the technical
aspects of these weapons and of the “grave danger for the safety of this
country as well as for the future of all the other nations, of which the rest
of mankind is unaware. We therefore feel it our duty to urge that the
political problems, arising from the mastering of nuclear power, be recognized . . . and that appropriate steps be taken for their study and the preparation of necessary decisions.”36
In the way of bureaucracies, the secretary of war passed the Franck
Report to his Interim Committee on nuclear issues, headed by Bush and
Conant, who passed it to their committee’s Scientific Advisory Panel,
consisting of Oppenheimer as chair, Ernest Lawrence, Enrico Fermi, and
Arthur Compton. The advisory panel found no feasible alternative to a
surprise nuclear attack on Japan. A demonstration bomb might prove to be
a dud, they reasoned, thus causing the opposite effect. If warned of an impending attack, the Japanese might put prisoners of war in the target area.
Instead, the committee supported an argument put forth by Compton and
others at the time who emphasized “the opportunity of saving American
lives by immediate military use.”37 It is estimated that a D-day style Allied
invasion of the Japanese homeland would have cost upward of a million
lives, including Japanese as well American and those of the other Allies.38
Regarding policy matters, the advisory panel went even farther. In an
important statement for the postwar era, Oppenheimer, writing for the
panel, renounced the Franck Report’s insistence on a measure of responsibility by the scientists for the use of their work. He reaffirmed Bush’s
vision of scientists as contractors providing technical results with no role
in decision making concerning their use. “With regard to these general
aspects of the use of atomic energy, it is clear that we, as scientific men,
have no proprietary rights. It is true that we are among the few citizens
who have had occasion to give thoughtful consideration to these problems
during the past few years. We have, however, no claim to special competence in solving the political, social, and military problems which are presented by the advent of atomic power.”39
On July 26, ten days after the successful Trinity test, the leaders of the
United States, Great Britain, and China issued an ultimatum to the Japanese demanding unconditional surrender. “The alternative for Japan is
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
T h e P h y s ic i s t s ’ Wa r
89
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
prompt and utter destruction,” the ultimatum declared—without elaboration.40 The Japanese rejected it. On August 6, 1945, the uranium bomb
obliterated 68 percent of the Japanese port city of Hiroshima, along with
many of its residents. Three days later, the plutonium bomb devastated
Nagasaki with another great loss of life. It is estimated that in the range of
200,000 people died in the two blasts and another 100,000 died later of
injuries, burns, and radiation poisoning.
The Japanese government received another shock on August 9 when the
Soviet Union declared war on Japan and invaded Manchuria, then occupied by Japanese forces. On August 15, Japan sued for peace. On September
2, Japanese representatives surrendered unconditionally. The physicists’
war was over.
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:23.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
5
Taming the Endless Frontier
The stunning successes of the Manhattan Project, the MIT Radiation
Laboratory, and the many other research and development efforts during
the war convinced the nation’s leaders of the crucial importance of fundamental discoveries achieved through what was now called basic research.
The close collaboration of the military with scientists and engineers working in the highly technical disciplines of nuclear physics, electromagnetic
theory, and electronics had produced the war’s “winning weapons.”
As victory approached, President Roosevelt asked his top science administrator Vannevar Bush to reconnoiter the contours of the postwar relationship between science and the federal government. In his well-known
and widely influential report submitted to President Truman in 1945 titled
Science: The Endless Frontier, Bush, still director of the Office of Scientific
Research and Development (OSRD), argued not only that the close partnership must continue, but that a devastated Eu rope could no longer provide the new fundamental knowledge on which the successful wartime
technologies had largely rested. The federal government must now take
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
91
an active role in funding and promoting basic research in civilian laboratories, and those laboratories must be willing to accept federal funding. In
the pure science tradition he defi ned the basic research to be promoted
as that performed “without thought of practical ends.” Despite its federal
funding, the sponsored research would entail the curiosity-driven exploration for new knowledge of nature on the endless frontier of science.1
This knowledge would eventually fi nd its way into new beneficial applications. By not exploring that endless frontier, he argued, the nation would
place itself at a competitive disadvantage, militarily and economically.
Federal officials already expected that new discoveries in basic physics
would continue to yield benefits for “national security”—not only by enabling the development of new weaponry but also by enhancing the nation’s
scientific prestige in the increasing competition for power and recognition
with the Soviet Union. Industry, too, expected potential postwar contributions of unfettered pure physics to the development of new products for the
booming consumer society. But government still needed encouragement
toward active promotion. Before the war, business and philanthropy had
funded basic research in the big-science accelerator laboratories in the expectation of new patents and medical cures. The federal government, Bush
argued, must now take on this role. Even as physicists remained suspicious
of government political influence, they understood the necessity of federal funding for large-scale projects whose costs soon exceeded the means
of universities and private donors and even most corporations. Physicists
needed the government as much as the government needed physicists. But
the partnership had to be redefined as the nation entered the postwar era.
T h e N at ion a l Sc i e nc e Fou n dat ion
One avenue to the redefined partnership ran through Bush’s report to the
president. The Bush report is best known for its main proposal, the establishment of a new federal agency to replace the OSRD and to institutionalize Bush’s vision of the postwar science-government partnership. It
led to what became today’s National Science Foundation (NSF). Drawing
upon elements of prewar pure science and his own wartime success, Bush
presented four main arguments for the new foundation: the essential need
for basic research as the foundation of future power and prosperity; the
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
92
Taming the Endless Frontier
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
vital role that government funding must play in fostering civilian research;
the need for a civilian-directed national science policy, including a military
research policy; and, finally, the freedom of inquiry for basic research and
researchers from government policy meddling, even as universities accepted huge sums in support of the federal policy agenda.
In order to achieve these aims, Bush proposed a civilian “National Research Foundation.” As did the wartime OSRD, the new foundation would
act as an intermediary. It would funnel federal research funds directly to
universities and other nonprofit laboratories “that,” he wrote, “should by
contract and otherwise support long-range research on military matters.”2
If Bush had his way, physicists and other basic researchers would be freed
as before from political influence and obligations regarding their work,
but, also as during the war, they would be subject instead to the demands
and obligations of long-range research on “military matters.” In return
they would achieve secure federal funding; civilian administrators would
exercise influence equal to federal authorities over the supported research;
and, in the long run, the nation would reap the competitive benefits.
As early as 1945, Senator Harley M. Kilgore, a New Deal Democrat,
submitted a bill for the creation of what was now called the National Science Foundation to replace the OSRD—but not exactly along the lines
Bush had in mind. The new NSF would fund research and education in
all fields of science and medicine, including civilian military research, but
it would also include the social sciences. Under the authority of an administrator appointed by the president, Kilgore’s NSF would also establish
and coordinate a national research policy, but it would direct grants as well
to applied research for the social good. It would also vest all patent rights
from funded research in the federal government rather than in private
hands, and it would spread its funds evenly across the country and across
research institutions in order to raise the quality of all.
The Kilgore approach was straight out of the New Deal. In opposition
to it, Senator Warren Magnuson, also inspired by Bush, submitted an
alternative to the Kilgore bill in 1945. The Magnuson bill replaced the
president’s appointee as the overseer of the foundation by an autonomous
Science Board of civilian scientists in order to insulate the foundation
from political influence. (But Congress would still hold the purse strings.)
In addition to the contract system, the NSF would operate through the
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
93
project-grant system invented by German scientists during the 1920s, and
for much the same reason: to insulate science from the German democracy
of the period. In this system, researchers submitted project proposals for
competitive evaluation through independent peer review and approval by
the independent Science Board. It was a process that would prove as highly
successful for the Americans as it had for the Germans. In addition, the
Magnuson bill, with the concurrence of the Science Board, stripped from
Bush’s plan the funding of military-related civilian research. It also excluded funding for the social sciences, which Bush regarded as politically
motivated. Despite President Truman’s concerns about Bush’s own political
motives, a compromise NSF bill embodying much of Bush’s vision, except
for civilian military research, finally passed Congress, and Truman signed
it into law in 1950.3
In its operation, the NSF exhibited the familiar strategy of pushing the
existing peaks higher—the channeling of funds to large numbers of selected individuals at a small number of top universities, located mainly on
the east and west coasts. Because those scientists were already among the
elite, they naturally submitted the most competitive proposals for funding.
In 1954–1955, for instance, 62 percent of NSF grants went to doctoral and
postdoctoral researchers at just eleven institutions, all housing large research groups led by a few big-name scientists. This emphasis on supporting an elite meritocracy of researchers extended throughout the federal
funding scheme for science in the United States, including physics. But
because the NSF did not handle military research, Defense Department
agencies quickly emerged as by far the nation’s largest source of federal
funds for research and development thereafter. According to NSF statistics, in fiscal year 1951, the Defense Department provided nearly 70 percent of federal research and development (R&D) funds, about $1.3 billion,
while the entire budget for the NSF amounted to only about $150,000
(see Table 2 in the Appendix). During the academic year 1952–1953, there
were ninety physics PhD granting institutions in the United States, but
72 percent of all federal funds for nonclassified academic research in physics went to just seventeen institutions enrolling 65 percent of the nation’s
physics graduate students.4
Still, as in the 1920s and 1930s, pushing the peaks higher once again
achieved its purpose. It brought huge success to American physics in
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
94
Taming the Endless Frontier
discoveries and growth during the 1950s and 1960s, and it maintained the
nation at the forefront of world research in what many now regarded as
the “American century,” even if only a fraction of American physicists, and
even fewer female physicists, could participate in the new discoveries.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
T h e M i l i ta ry Ta k e s C om m a n d
Having learned the lesson of the atom bomb, whose origins lay in seemingly arcane nuclear research, most military leaders required no convincing about the potential military value of “pure” science, even if they could
not immediately foresee any useful applications. Funds began to flow into
basic research almost as soon as the war ended. General Groves was the
first to leap into action. In the fall of 1945 he provided $175,000 in leftover
Manhattan Project funds for a new “synchrotron” accelerator at Berkeley.
Lawrence’s big 184-inch machine was capable of reaching the worldrecord energy of 100 million electron volts (MeV), but it hit a wall erected
by relativity theory. As accelerated particles increase in speed, or kinetic
energy, they also increase in mass, as required by Einstein’s theory of special relativity. Because of the increasing masses of the accelerated particles, it is difficult to keep them on the cyclotron’s circular track. Drawing
upon an idea put forth by Australian physicist Marcus Oliphant, Lawrence’s right-hand man Edwin McMillan solved the problem by altering
the strength of the magnetic field and the frequency of the accelerating
electric field in synchronization with each other and with the increasing
masses of the particles. Thanks to Groves’s generosity, by 1946 Berkeley’s
new “synchrotron” was up and running and producing particle energies
exceeding 200 MeV. This was more than enough energy needed to produce new particles— and new discoveries— out of the energies of accelerated particles smashing into targets.5
The Groves grant served as both a reward for wartime ser vice and a
down payment on any future discoveries of potential military value. Not
to let the army gain an advantage, in 1946 the navy opened the Office of
Naval Research (ONR) in Arlington, Virginia. It began doling out millions in contract funds for basic and applied research to nearly every serious researcher who asked, and with few strings attached.6 The idea that
independent “pure research” would inevitably lead to practical applica-
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
95
tions required little argumentation. For the navy there was no question
that curiosity-driven research was as potentially beneficial to the military
as was applied research and development. The ONR became the primary
supporter of the nation’s academic research laboratories, and American
scientists became the best funded of any in the postwar industrialized
world. The ONR support to physicists in their home laboratories became
so ubiquitous that nearly 80 percent of the papers presented during a
meeting of the American Physical Society in 1948 acknowledged ONR
support.7 So much money flowed into research from military and nuclearfunding agencies that some physicists began to worry about the public
perception of physics. Lee DuBridge, Millikan’s successor as president of
Caltech, told a congressional committee, “There is a wide-spread feeling
in the country that the only purpose of science is to develop weapons of
war and that science can be kept on a wartime footing . . . The chief goal
of science is not to develop weapons, but to understand nature.”8
Massive military funding helped drive the rapid expansion of American
science, promoted the growth of computer technology, fostered new hybrid disciplines such as geophysics, and supported important foundational
studies in fields such as physical meteorology and global warming. But few
scientists apparently bothered to consider the potential effects of military
funding, even without visible strings attached.9 Nevertheless, such funding did come at a price for the scientists and their science. By accepting
federal defense funds, the scientific community could not easily object to
military plans that it might find objectionable, including the later program
to build the hydrogen bomb. Nor could the defense-supported scientific
community easily object to the heavy-handed treatment of its members
by McCarthy era inquisitions, imposed loyalty oaths, and the laboratory
secrecy required by the national-security state.
Most importantly, however, historian Paul Forman has argued that the
generous military funding of science caused “a qualitative change in its
purposes and character.” Impressed by the war time successes of radar,
rockets, and the atomic bomb, military funders tended to emphasize technological superiority over fundamental new scientific insights. The effects,
Forman argued, could be observed, for example, in the study of quantum
electronics, which brought us the laser: “we may say that support by military
agencies and consultation on military problems had effectively rotated the
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
96
Taming the Endless Frontier
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
orientation of academic physics toward techniques and applications . . .
Physicists had lost control of their discipline.”10
Other historians, most notably Daniel Kevles, have disputed the “distortionist” argument that military funding “seduced American physicists
from, so to speak, a ‘true basic physics.’ ” Instead, Kevles argues, such funding exerted a positive influence, not only by promoting the rapid expansion
of physics, but also by helping to integrate American physics into the
national-security system as both a research and an advisory enterprise,
where it enjoyed greater influence in promoting its interests.11 Others have
perceived the possibility of a middle position arising out of a “ ‘grey area’
in the distortionist debate”: scientists were able to maintain a measure of
independence even as their institutions engaged in classified research or
were heavily funded by the military.12
As tensions with the Soviet Union increased after the war, the nation
continued its weapons programs while maintaining science and engineering on a permanent war footing. Appropriate institutions to manage these
activities now became essential. While the ONR provided one channel of
military funding and the NSF another for nonmilitary funding to universities, a new organization was needed to replace the Manhattan District
and to oversee all the nation’s nuclear research. In October 1945, the Truman administration submitted to Congress the May-Johnson Bill for the
establishment of an Atomic Energy Commission (AEC). Named for the two
senators who sponsored the bill, it was largely the product of army administrators, including General Groves. The bill was also supported by a
small group of physics leaders—Lawrence, Fermi, Oppenheimer, and Arthur Compton. Its provisions placed control of all nuclear research in a
part-time commission of military officers appointed by the president. It
emphasized secrecy and the military control of research; it called for the
continued development of nuclear weapons over economic uses of nuclear
energy as the primary goal of American policy; and it incorporated only
few patent protections against the industrial monopolization of nuclear
power and related applications by a few leading corporations.13
Most physicists greeted the May-Johnson Bill with shock and anger.
Nuclear weapons, they argued, should be controlled by a civilian agency,
nuclear power should also benefit civilian energy needs, and civilian research should not be completely under military control. The bill unleashed
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
97
a storm of protest, galvanizing an already growing scientists’ movement
for the international control of nuclear weapons. Moreover, it forced an
irreparable break between the scientists and their leaders in Washington
that began to spell the end of the long tradition of a few elite scientistadministrators exercising authority over the affairs of the entire physics
community.
Protesting scientists descended upon Washington, and organizations
including the Federation of Atomic Scientists, the Association of Los
Alamos Scientists, and the influential publication Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists began mobilizing public opinion against the bill. Harold Urey
told Congress that the May-Johnson Bill “would create a potential dictator
of science.” Leo Szilard said the bill seemed aimed at only one purpose:
“to make atomic bombs and blast hell out of Russia before Russia blasts
hell out of us.”14
Surprised at the physicists’ response, Truman began to entertain alternatives. In December 1945, after working with the scientists, Senator Brien
McMahon, with Truman’s support, submitted a bill for an AEC composed
instead of a civilian director and five full-time civilian commissioners.15 It
would include advisory committees of civilian scientists and engineers,
funding for nonclassified basic research in addition to nuclear weapons
research (the first commercial reactors did not appear until 1951), and
provisions for any patents resulting from federal funding to be held by the
federal government rather than by private individuals and corporations.
The bill passed in June 1946 and was signed into law at the end of the
year. The AEC remained in place until 1974, when it was split into the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the Energy Research and
Development Administration. In 1977 the latter became today’s cabinetlevel Department of Energy, responsible, among other things, for maintaining the nation’s nuclear arsenal. The NRC, which still oversees reactors and radiation, has remained an independent federal agency.
Truman appointed David Lilienthal, the director of the Tennessee
Valley Authority, the hydroelectric power agency, to head the new AEC.
One of Lilienthal’s first acts was to appoint the commission’s top advisory
panel of civilian experts on nuclear weapons and reactors, the General
Advisory Committee. It reflected the new working partnership among academic physicists, industrial engineers, and government officials in matters
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
98
Taming the Endless Frontier
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
of nuclear policy, civilian and military. Chaired by J. Robert Oppenheimer,
the other members of the General Advisory Committee in 1949 included
Fermi, Conant, Rabi, DuBridge, Berkeley chemist Glenn Seaborg, industrialist Hartley Rowe, Cyril Stanley of the University of Chicago, and
Hood Worthington, a DuPont engineer.16
Although the AEC was still primarily a nuclear weapons agency subject
to presidential and military oversight, the scientists had achieved their
goal of establishing civilian input regarding nuclear weapons policy. Between the ONR and the AEC, even more money began flowing into research with even fewer strings attached. Scientists were thinking again
about big science. Because accelerators were still considered a branch of
nuclear physics, the AEC inherited from Groves and the army oversight
of accelerator physics. The leading physicists on the General Advisory
Committee, most of whom were veterans of the Manhattan Project, convinced the AEC to begin pouring funds into the construction of expensive new accelerators. The accelerators might have seemed to offer little
immediate practical military or commercial value, but Lawrence had used
his 1940 accelerator to separate the fi rst batch of fissionable uranium
isotope— as fission physics had demonstrated, who knew what might possibly emerge, even from this highly abstract branch of physics?
With generous funding from the AEC, in 1947 Isidor I. Rabi, Norman
Ramsey, and a consortium of nine universities founded an East Coast accelerator laboratory at Brookhaven on Long Island, New York. By 1948
the AEC was funding the construction of, and fostering competition between, even bigger synchrotrons at Brookhaven and Berkeley designed to
reach 3 billion and 6 billion electron volts, respectively. In 1952 Edward
Teller and Ernest Lawrence founded the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory
at Livermore, California, not far from its parent, Lawrence’s Rad Lab in
Berkeley. With Herbert York as director, the new laboratory was intended
to serve as competition for the Los Alamos laboratory. Thanks to AEC
dollars, by 1953 the United States had two nuclear weapons laboratories,
thirty-five accelerators, and eleven research reactors in operation, the most
and biggest of any nation. The United States now led the world in civilian
and military nuclear research and in the prestigious field of what was now
called high-energy physics.17
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Taming the Endless Frontier
99
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
E x pl oi t i ng At oms for Pe ac e
Confident of the newly proclaimed American Century, the United States
did not hesitate to use its enormous postwar scientific and technological
power, together with its economic and military might, to promote its foreign policy interests abroad. At the end of World War II, most of Europe
lay in ruins, economies were in collapse, and populations struggled without adequate food and shelter. One of the four postwar occupation powers
in Germany, the United States appropriated any German patents, equipment, and scientists that it found useful for its domestic science and industry, as did the other powers. But as the four powers began to split into
Cold War opponents, it was clear that an economic and political power
vacuum in Western Germany and Eu rope might easily invite Soviet attempts at control or even occupation. American Marshall Plan money began flowing into the reconstruction of Western Eu rope, not only for humanitarian purposes but more so for creating a joint American-European
alliance against Soviet domination. Naturally, the prevailing argument
in the United States that the funding of basic research was essential to
future economic and military growth applied also to Eu ropean nations.
While Vannevar Bush and others helped direct Marshall Plan funds into
basic research in Eu rope, Isidor Rabi, who served on an advisory committee to the U.S. occupation authorities, worked toward the reconstruction
and revival of German science as an aid to the revival of Western Europe
as a whole.
As the U.S. representative to the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Rabi presented a resolution
to a meeting of the UNESCO general assembly in June 1950 calling for
the establishment of “regional research centers and laboratories.” Because
West Germany was still prohibited from engaging in nuclear fission research of any type, including reactors, Rabi suggested the creation of
a consortium of Western Eu ropean nations—much like the Brookhaven
Laboratory’s consortium of universities—for the support of a single European high-energy accelerator laboratory that could, with initial U.S.
assistance, compete on an international level with Soviet and American
accelerators.18 After overcoming initial suspicions about American motives,
the Europeans eventually accepted, and in 1952 eleven nations created the
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
100
Taming the Endless Frontier
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire, or CERN, to plan and
develop an accelerator facility to be constructed on the French-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland. In 1954 the Conseil changed its official
name to Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire, or European Organization for Nuclear Research, but it kept the original acronym, CERN. (Future references here will retain current usage: CERN,
the European Organization for Nuclear Research.)
The efforts to revive European science, and to create CERN as the
centerpiece of that revival, helped to put Western Eu rope back on its feet.
However, in the Cold War era, writes historian John Krige, these efforts
also served “to promote a U.S. scientific and foreign policy agenda in
Western Eu rope”: to integrate Western Eu rope into an Atlantic alliance
under the control and protection of the American nuclear umbrella. Even
though Rabi and colleagues may not have had quite those aims in mind,
the building or rebuilding of Eu ropean laboratories aided the American
agenda, not only by reviving a strong western Eu rope, but also by enabling
American scientists to benefit from any interesting European research
and by helping to overcome domestic hostility to U.S. support of foreign
research as part of this agenda.19
The utilization of the U.S. lead in science and technology as a foreign policy instrument became clearer in December 1953 when President
Eisenhower announced to the General Assembly of the United Nations a
new American initiative toward the achievement of world peace, what he
called “Atoms for Peace.” Following the end of the Korean War and the
death of Stalin in 1953, Eisenhower and his State Department settled on
the Atoms for Peace initiative as a means to showcase American superiority and to promote United States nuclear policy for Eu rope while at the
same time diffusing European concerns about that policy and pressuring
domestic industries to invest in nuclear reactor technology.20 In his address to the United Nations, Eisenhower called upon the Soviet Union
and other nuclear nations to work together with the United States to reduce nuclear tensions and to redirect nuclear energy toward “the peaceful
pursuits of mankind.” Toward that end, he called, among other things, for
the U.N. to establish a new Atomic Energy Agency (now the International
Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA) that would gather donations from nuclear nations of radioactive isotopes and enriched reactor-grade uranium
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
101
to be distributed to non-nuclear nations. Reactors installed under the
auspices of the agency would “provide abundant electrical energy in the
power starved areas of the world,” while the isotopes, distributed on a
grander scale than was the case in any earlier U.S. program, would benefit
medicine and agriculture.21
Eisenhower’s Atoms for Peace program received nearly universal acclamation. Foreign nations welcomed it, both for its peaceful uses of atomic
energy and for the economic and scientific benefits it afforded. The American public welcomed it as well, and much good did come of the international cooperation and collaboration. But from the longer historical view,
Atoms for Peace again primarily served the United States’ Cold War agenda
for Europe. At that time, the United States was shifting from a reliance
on conventional forces to defend Eu rope against a potential Soviet invasion to a less costly nuclear defense that required the nuclearization of
the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) nations under American
oversight.
But not all nations were eager to comply with the American nuclear
agenda. Britain was already nuclear, and France was developing its own
nuclear arsenal, and both had their own foreign policy plans. Prominent
West German scientists successfully mobilized German public opinion
against an independent German nuclear weapons program. Germany, the
likely battleground if the Soviet Union did invade Western Europe, has
remained militarily non-nuclear ever since.
The building of peaceful reactors in Europe helped to divert foreign
public concern and reluctance during the controversial transition to reliance on nuclear deterrence. At the same time, the delivery of isotopes for
research and peaceful applications helped to ensure American access to
foreign research for monitoring and utilization, while the arrangement of
international scientific meetings provided rare opportunities for assessing
the capabilities and activities of Soviet scientists and those from other nations for intelligence purposes.22
Isidor Rabi, then chairman of the AEC’s General Advisory Committee,
initiated and helped organize the most famous of the international meetings to arise from the Atoms for Peace program, the U.N. International
Conference on Peaceful Uses of the Atom, fi rst held in Geneva in August
1955. Its purpose was to provide scientists from both sides of the Cold
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
102
Taming the Endless Frontier
War the opportunity to meet for the first time since the onset of hostilities and to exchange ideas and information on the peaceful uses of the
atom. The conference helped to reduce political tensions and public fears
about nuclear war, and it helped to stimulate international cooperation
through the IAEA, which is still active today in monitoring nuclear proliferation. But it also provided the Americans with new insights into Soviet
science that, if anything, increased their fears about Soviet capabilities.
Far from the American stereotype of Soviet scientists as incompetent
ideologues, Soviet physicists turned out to be highly capable researchers
who delighted in the respect shown them by their Western colleagues.
In addition to being impressed, their colleagues were shocked to learn
of Soviet plans to challenge the American lead in one of the most prized
symbols of scientific superiority, accelerator physics. The Soviets were
planning the construction of a huge machine capable of producing particle energies reaching 10 billion electron volts, far in excess of the energies
then attained by the biggest American machines.
Noting that “the Soviet Union has challenged our leadership,” physicist
Frederick Seitz leapt into action. He demanded that the Department of
Defense, which provided 74 percent of federal research funds that year,
establish a new high-energy physics funding program in addition to the
program already funded by the AEC. It is “essential that the United
States retain its leadership in all essential parts of the field,” the solid-state
physicist informed the military leaders.23 Defense of America’s lead in
this field in particular was so important that, in his view, it was a potential
matter of military concern.
Mobi l i z i ng M a l e s
As federal funds flooded into domestic research after the war, American
scientists became not only the best funded of the industrialized world, but
also the most numerous—further enhancing their influence on the world
stage. The demand for physicists in postwar industry and academe rose
sharply, and with it the number of new PhDs. The Great Depression was
over, demand for consumer goods was up, and the GI Bill was sending
an army of war veterans to colleges and universities. The annual production of new physics PhDs jumped from 47 in 1945 to 500 in 1950, and it
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
103
remained there approximately until the end of the 1950s.24 According to
data compiled by Rossiter (see Table 3 in the Appendix), by the mid-1950s
the number of physicists and astronomers in the United States was 11,452.
Of these it is estimated that one fourth were in academia and three fourths
in industry. An analysis of the institutions producing physics PhDs during the 1950s reveals that the same top ten institutions that produced the
most PhDs during the 1930s (accounting for 50 percent of all physics
PhDs) were also among the top ten during the 1950s (now producing 40
percent of all PhDs). It was no accident that in both decades they were
also among the largest recipients of federal and corporate funding. During the 1950s the top two PhD-producing institutions were UC Berkeley
and MIT, and each produced nearly twice as many physics doctorates (339
and 303, respectively) as each of the other institutions.25
The demand for new doctorates and the flow of money into research
also had a significant impact on the demographic makeup of the postwar
physics profession. The war had brought large numbers of women, as substitutes for male workers, into broad areas of the nation’s economy. During the early postwar years, many women, including those working in
scientific fields, remained temporarily in place while the returning veterans, taking advantage of the GI Bill, obtained further education. The
onset of the Cold War, beginning with the Berlin Blockade in 1948, followed by the outbreak of the Korean War in 1950, reinforced the government’s policy of maintaining the nation’s economy and its science on a
permanent war footing. With the universal military draft of men still in
place and a monthly quota of new inductees reaching 50,000 per month
in 1950, a year later President Truman called for the establishment of a
permanent standing army of 3.5 million men.
In view of the demands for both soldiers and scientists, the nation could
not afford to ignore its underutilized human resources: women and minorities. The Office of Defense Mobilization (ODM), located in the President’s executive office, called for mobilizing women and minorities for
careers in science and engineering (though not for military ser vice) and
for employers to employ them. The NSF and ODM undertook a number
of statistical studies of the nation’s scientific manpower, of great value to
us today, and a host of articles in science publications called for increased
training of female scientists and engineers. More access to science for
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
104
Taming the Endless Frontier
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
women and minorities remained the government’s official policy for nearly
a decade. An ODM report in 1952 recommended that employers “reexamine their personnel policies and effect any changes necessary to assure full utilization of women and members of minority groups having
scientific and engineering training.”26
Nevertheless, Margaret Rossiter has found that the new policy remained
little more than empty rhetoric. There were no federal incentives or enforcement to back up the federal recommendations. By 1954–1955 women
were being encouraged to enter science teaching rather than science research. By 1960 opposition to the recommendations had already mounted.27
Rossiter has compiled a wealth of information and statistics from the
NSF and other “manpower” studies that portray once again the continuing underrepresentation of women in physics and other sciences during
the decades following World War II, despite the obvious need for their
participation in the nation’s science and engineering. (Data on minorities
are not currently available.) Table 3 in the Appendix displays the steady
growth in the number of scientists and engineers and in the number of
physicists and astronomers in the United States from 1955 to 1970 (data
for these disciplines were combined). Much of this occurred, of course, in
reaction to the launch of the Soviet Sputnik satellite in 1957. The number
of scientists/engineers and physicists/astronomers roughly tripled during
that period, as did the number of men in each category. But even though
the number of women in both categories roughly quadrupled, the increase
in their percentage representation was far more modest. The representation of women physicists and astronomers during the massive build up of
science and engineering after the war, then again after Sputnik, still remained at about the same percentage of the profession in 1970 as it had
been in 1938 and even in 1921! (Compare Table 1 in the Appendix.) With
the prevalent stifling stereotypes of family and gender during the 1950s,
women were still discouraged from entering science and were apparently
still considered unsuited for scientific research.
Rossiter showed further that, despite the overall burst in the number of
science doctorates during the period from 1948 to 1961, female scientists
received only about 8 percent of the doctorates awarded in science. In the
Purdue University chemistry department, for instance, the number of
women students and their choice of specialties were severely limited be-
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
Taming the Endless Frontier
105
cause so few professors were willing to take on a female student. Only 115
of the over 6,000 physics doctorates in that period went to women, a mere
1.87 percent. The most popular doctoral fields for women were psychology, biosciences, and even chemistry, but women were still vastly underrepresented in those fields as well. While, as noted earlier, the University
of California at Berkeley and MIT awarded by far the most PhDs in physics, only Berkeley (appearing together with UCLA) is in the list compiled
by Rossiter of the top twenty-five institutions awarding science doctorates
to women, including doctorates in “physics and meteorology.”28
The employment picture reflected a parallel underrepresentation of
women physicists in both industry and academe. Even as the numbers of
male and female physicists in industry increased during the years 1958 to
1968, female representation still dropped over that decade from 1.51 percent to just 1.41 percent. By 1970 about 38 percent of women scientists employed in industry or academe were engaged in teaching, about a third were
employed in research, and only about 9 percent worked in management.29
The early decades of the Cold War and the efforts to mobilize science
and scientists in defense of the nation and its culture clearly did not extend
to women, and least of all to African Americans and other minorities. In
1973 Shirley Ann Jackson graduated from MIT, the first African-American
female doctorate in physics. Herman Russell Branson was one of the first
male African-American doctorates in physics when he graduated from the
University of Cincinnati in 1939. Despite the nation’s needs and the government’s recommendations, women scientists achieved only minimal
gains in the still largely white-male dominated disciplines of physics and of
science in general.
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:28:49.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
6
The New Physics
World War II and the postwar aftermath brought striking changes to the
structure of the physics discipline and to the nature of its work. Not only
did the high demand for physicists during the war continue after the war,
but also, with money flowing, big projects, big teams, and big budgets became common— a reflection in many ways of the mass production characteristic of the postwar consumer society. As funding increased the number of researchers and the outpouring of their research, the lone researcher
tinkering in a laboratory or sequestered in an office with a pad of paper
and a pencil had nearly become a thing of the past. Nevertheless, a number of individual researchers and small groups of researchers did manage
to make important breakthroughs in this period. Owing to the practical
needs of the military and industrial funders of research, many of these
breakthroughs occurred on the border of science and technology, as Paul
Forman has argued. Yet, even as individuals, their discoveries would not
have been possible without the large-scale wartime and postwar research
that preceded their work, or the military resources that funded theirs and
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:29:15.
The New Physics
107
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
prior work, or the huge institutional organizations that supported them.
As Spencer Weart writes, “American physics was no longer like a small
town where everyone knew each other.”1 Now in a big city, some physicists tended to identify more with their local neighborhoods: their individual subdisciplines and local research teams.
Through its wartime contributions, theoretical physics had gained by
now a status comparable to experimental research. Nevertheless, most of
the dividends of postwar research accrued instead to experimental physics
as the result of the wartime successes.2 Those dividends and the impetus
of the MIT Radiation Laboratory also enabled the emergence of a new
physics discipline that drew adherents from a number of related disciplines.
As early as 1944 the American Physical Society established the Division
for Solid-State Physics, a division that drew together academic and industrial physicists in the study of the properties of solids, their quantum origins, and their practical uses. (Today, with the inclusion of liquids, the
field is known as condensed-matter physics.) Spencer Weart has described
how this field emerged and established itself by 1960—with the direct
help of the Office of Naval Research (ONR) and the Department of Defense— as an independent discipline with its own journals, textbooks,
meetings, prizes, and buildings, first in the United States and then in Europe and abroad.3
“The
C rys ta l M a z e ”
Following the development of microwave radar during the war, a number
of university and industrial laboratories began investigating semiconductor crystals after the war as the basis for developing smaller and more
efficient electronic components to replace vacuum tubes. They already had
experience during the war with one solid-state component, a crystal diode
rectifier able to withstand the high “back voltages” required for the detection of microwave radar beams (as the standard radio-wave vacuum tubes
of the day became unstable at these voltages). In 1942 the MIT Radiation
Laboratory had awarded an Office of Scientific Research and Development subcontract to the Purdue University physics department for supplemental work on the development of a suitable diode rectifier. Austrian born
and educated department head Karl Lark-Horovitz had gained experience
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:29:15.
108
The New Physics
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
with crystal-diode radio during World War I, but vacuum tubes had long
since replaced diodes in radio technology. While the MIT Rad Lab investigated silicon, the Purdue team under Lark-Horovitz worked in a different direction—toward the investigation of the still little-researched element germanium as the basis for the needed rectifier. Germanium and
silicon are normally insulators, but researchers at the Sperry Gyroscope
Company had gained the fi rst evidence that by “doping” germanium
and silicon with certain impurities they could create so- called n-type and
p-type “semiconductors” that can transmit currents of either negative or
positive charges, respectively. Because of this, the electrical properties
could be easily controlled and used for a variety of purposes. Purdue physicists undertook careful studies of this effect in germanium. By spring 1943
they had produced the first high back-voltage germanium diode. The MIT
Rad Lab assigned mass production of this early device to Bell Telephone
Laboratories.4
The Purdue team continued to perfect high back-voltage germanium
rectifiers, contributing to the development of the more commonly utilized
version, and they investigated theoretically and experimentally the electronic properties of germanium in general. By the end of the war, the department was even producing its own stock of high-purity germaniumcrystal ingots for further research. Theorist Vivian A. Johnson, who played
a key role in the Purdue germanium research, reported that at the end of
the war the group decided “to abandon development of detectors and the
practical applications and to concentrate on the basic investigation of germanium semiconductors.” Following the declassification of their work,
the Purdue physics department found itself on the forefront of solid-state
research. As other universities and laboratories joined the work on germanium and other semiconductors, in January 1946 Lark-Horovitz reported
for the first time on the physics of germanium to an overflow audience at
the annual meeting of the American Physical Society. The Purdue work
played a vital role not only in advancing solid-state research but also in a
discovery soon to emerge from Bell Telephone Laboratories.
In 1945 Bell Laboratories became the first and for many years the only
institution to establish an entire department dedicated solely to the study
of solid-state physics. Mervin Kelly, the director of research, stated that
with the utilization of quantum mechanics, “a unified approach to all of
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:29:15.
Copyright © 2011. Harvard University Press. All rights reserved.
The New Physics
109
our solid state problems offers great promise.”5 One of the solid-state
problems for the new department was to move beyond crystal diodes to
the development of a solid-state triode amplifier to replace the commonly
used vacuum-tube amplifiers still used in long-distance telephone service. Within the new department, William Shockley, a physics graduate
of Caltech and MIT, headed the semiconductor division, which included
John Bardeen and Walter Brattain. Shockley and Brattain, adept in experimental solid-state physics, had worked during the war at Columbia
University on submarine detection under contract to the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Bardeen, a theoretical physicist from
Princeton, had worked at the Naval Ordnance Laboratory during the war.
Because of Purdue’s pathbreaking work on germanium, they focused on
germanium rather than silicon as the basis for their new device. Utilizing
quantum theory and doped germanium crystals supplied by Purdue, their
research led Bardeen and Brattain in 1947 to the discovery, briefly put, that
a small electric current emitted onto the surface of a germanium crystal
diode is amplified after passing through the semiconductor. The device
was called the point-contact “transistor,” named because it transmitted or
resisted current depending on the voltage at the base of the crystal. The
new device and its later improvements enabled the replacement of vacuum tubes by much more reliable, smaller, more energy-efficient solidstate electronics. With Shockley’s participation, in 1951 the team joined
together three doped germanium crystals into what became today’s triode “junction transistor.” It proved more mechanically stable and much
easier to manufacture than the point-contact device. Shockley, Bardeen,
and Brattain received the 1956 Nobel Prize for physics “for their researches
on semiconductors and their discovery of the transistor effect.” 6
The transistor could be used not only as an electronic amplifier but also,
through its off and on states controlled by the voltage on its base, as a
switching device of use in telephone connections as well as logic circuits.
The off and on states provided an electronic representation of the digital
binary numbers 0 and 1.
In 1959 Jack Kilby, an engineer at Texas Instruments, constructed the
first transistor-based circuit on a single wafer of germanium crystal. A
year later, Robert Noyce, a physicist at Fairchild Semiconductor, invented
the photolithography technique for producing electronic microcircuits
Cassidy, D. C. (2011). A short history of physics in the american century : Short history of physics in the american century.
Retrieved from http://ebookcentral.proquest.com
Created from apus on 2020-02-16 21:29:15.
110
The New Physics
on a semiconductor cry...
Purchase answer to see full
attachment