Unwrapping the Standards Part 1: Video Evaluation Part 2: Writing Learning Objectives Grade Level State/National Social Studies Standard State/National Arts Standard DOK Level 1 Recall and Reproduction Obj: DOK Level 2 Skills and Concepts/Basic Reasoning Obj: DOK Level 3 Strategic Thinking/Complex Reasoning Obj: DOK Level 4 Extended Thinking/Reasoning Obj: © 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Course Code ELM-350 Class Code ELM-350-O500 Criteria Criteria Percentage 100.0% Part 1: Video Evaluation - Modeling Academic Language and Critical Thinking 20.0% Part 1: Video Evaluation - Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies 20.0% Part 2: Writing Learning Objectives 30.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 20.0% Organization 10.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Standards-Based Learning Objectives No Submission (0.00%) Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Not addressed. Total Points 40.0 Insufficient (65.00%) Inadequately discusses how the teacher in the video modeled the use of academic language and critical thinking skills. Examples are vague or missing. Insufficiently identifies questioning strategies to increase students’ critical thinking skills and depth of knowledge. Effect on student learning is minimally described. Objectives inappropriately address each of the four DOK levels or are weakly measurable. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other. Approaching (75.00%) Sufficiently discusses how the teacher in the video modeled the use of academic language and critical thinking skills. Examples are broad but in context. Attempts to identify questioning strategies to increase students’ critical thinking skills and depth of knowledge. Effect on student learning is moderately described. Objectives conventionally address each of the four DOK levels and are generally measurable. Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. The content is adequately organized, generally providing the audience with a sense of the main idea. Acceptable (85.00%) Effectively discusses how the teacher in the video modeled the use of academic language and critical thinking skills. Examples are used well. Suitably identifies questioning strategies to increase students’ critical thinking skills and depth of knowledge. Effect on student learning is competently described. Objectives successfully address each of the four DOK levels and are accurately measurable. Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. Target (100.00%) Thoroughly discusses how the teacher in the video modeled the use of academic language and critical thinking skills. Examples are in-depth. Comprehensively identifies questioning strategies to increase students’ critical thinking skills and depth of knowledge. Effect on student learning is skillfully described. Objectives proficiently address each of the four DOK levels and are substantially measurable. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. Comments Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment